| 21/04/05
 The future supply of Scottish grain to the whisky industry is being threatened
  by the low prices paid to farmers. Scotland's farming union has made
  the point as MSPs debate the use of Scottish grain in Scotch whisky today (Thursday
  21 April). Many farmers are thinking twice about growing malting barley, a
            key ingredient in the production of Scotch whisky, because the price
            being paid to them does not cover production costs. NFUS is extremely
            concerned that any increase in the use of imported, non-Scottish
            grain in the production of Scotch whisky could undermine the integrity
            of the Scotch whisky brand and jeopardise future sales. The price pressure is not restricted to farmers. The malting industry
            is suffering from a similar squeeze. Two of Scotland's malting
            facilities have announced their closure in recent months - the
            Muntons plant in Kirkcaldy and Greencore's facility in Carnoustie.
            NFUS is urging the supply chain, primarily distillers and retailers,
            to ensure the profits on whisky are shared fairly to protect the
            supply of one of its key ingredients and to protect the Scotch brand. MSPs are today involved in a member's debate in the Scottish
            Parliament led by Andrew Arbuckle MSP. The motion calls for Protected
            Geographic Indicator (PGI) status for Scotch whisky, demanding the
            use of Scottish-only grain in whisky production. Whilst NFUS recognises
            the difficulties with this route and the question marks over its
            effect on the industry, NFUS believes that distillers should adopt
            an official 'Scottish-first' policy when sourcing grain
            and ensure the right price incentive exists to secure Scottish supplies. Chairman of the NFUS Combinable Crops Committee is David Houghton,
            a cereal farmer from Easter Ross. He said: “On average, it costs over £100 to produce a tonne of
            malting barley, yet farmers' prices have consistently been £90
            a tonne or less. Understandably, many farmers are thinking twice
            about planting the crop. That has major implications for the whisky
            industry. “Worth over £2 billion a year, the Scotch whisky export
            industry is marketed on its 'Scottishness' and is a brand
            which is globally recognised. Any increase in the use of non-Scottish
            grain will undermine this brand. That will happen unless the profits
            from the whisky industry are shared more fairly through the supply
            chain. Whilst the whisky industry's commitment to Scottish
            grain has improved over the years and it now buys around 90 per cent
            of its grain requirements from Scotland, it may lose that option
            if that commitment is not translated into fairer prices. “We recognise that PGI status is problematic, legally and
            commercially. However, a Scottish-first policy of sourcing grain
            is extremely important. And that policy should be protected by a
            pricing structure which recognises the need to secure local supply
            and reflects the cost to farmers of producing quality.”  Improved profitability key to Whisky supply chain
 |