| 13/04/05
 Quick advice from all UK governments is needed for beef farmers
              who are keen to reduce production costs and raise efficiency by
              carrying the most appropriate types, and number, of cattle on their
            land. So says the National Beef Association which is aware of just how
              many lowland and upland suckled calf breeders are examining the
              pros and cons of establishing self-replacing herds or out-wintering
              spring calving cows but are still not sure of what they can, or
              cannot, do. "No one wants to be suddenly served with a potentially expensive
              environmental red card but current deliberations are handicapped
              because neither farmers, nor government, are sure exactly which
              husbandry methods are considered environmentally sustainable and
              which are not," explained NBA policy advisor, Kim-marie Haywood. "We have pointed out their dilemma to research specialists
              and while they appear prepared to initiate trials that will identify
              husbandry practices which minimise soil damage and other environmental
              impacts it will take at least five years, and probably more, for
              original research to nominate which is best." According to the NBA this is too long and good advice, which will
              cut the risk of falling foul of government's long term soil management
              plans, must be given sooner. "The core of the problem is that environmentalists love cattle
              in summer when their grazing contributes directly to habitat conservation
              but tend to challenge the practice of out-wintering due to possible
              soil and water contamination - even though it provides a considerable
              cost saving for the farmer," said Ms Haywood. "Wintering cattle outside is better for the health of the
              animals and if the system is properly installed it will minimise
              affects on the environment. Advisors must consider the impact on
              both the environment and on welfare when providing counsel on wintering
              systems." "Cross-compliance regulations are only a rough guide and
              do not cover some of the most important specifics." "For example wood chip corrals appear to be a perfect solution
              for some from both the environmental and husbandry point of view
              because they allow all types of cattle to be wintered efficiently
              and effectively without soil poaching." "However we are aware that there is disagreement among environmental
              specialist in different parts of the UK about whether they should
              get full approval." "This is a good example of an area where quick decisions
              are needed. There is no such thing as a perfect cattle winter management
              system but those that are least damaging need to be encouraged
              otherwise there will not be enough cattle to do the full environmental
              job in summer," Mr Haywood added. |