03/05/05
NFU Scotland has responded to the Scottish Executive's
consultation on changes to an important crofting grants scheme
and stressed that all crofters should have equal access to funding.
NFUS
has also reiterated the importance and value of the Executive's
support for crofting activity. The proposed changes concern the
Crofting Counties Agricultural Grants Scheme (CCAGS) which provides
support for a wide variety of agricultural activities in Scotland's
crofting counties.
NFUS believes that grants should be
available to all crofters and not confined to those in the Less
Favoured Area (LFA). The Union has also raised questions
over the use of the economic status test to assess whether crofters
should receive funding. Whilst not covered in the consultation,
NFUS also expressed disappointment at the change in support
for improving the quality of croftland. Previously, support
was available for bracken control and general improvement of
land through steps such as re-seeding or laying down permanent
pasture. This measure has now been limited to the restoration
of derelict land.
NFUS has also made other suggestions for the
future of the scheme. In the event that demand exceeds
the available CCAGS budget, NFUS believes that Ministers could
make an informed decision on which projects deserve support by
following the example of the Agricultural Business Development
Scheme (ABDS) and establishing a project assessment committee.
NFUS Vice President Bob Howat said: “Grant schemes in the
crofting counties are extremely important and the Executive's
funding makes a huge difference in these areas. The priority
for NFUS is to ensure equal access for all crofters whether they
are in the LFA or not. The economic test is often skewed
by income from non-crofting activity, which may not be invested
in the croft itself. “I understand that the change in support
for improving croftland has been determined by state aid rules. However,
it is still disappointing that a measure that was very useful
to enhancing the quality of land in the crofting counties has
now been restricted.
“We agree with the Executive that
control measures are needed in the event that demand exceeds
the budget. The system used for ABDS and its lowland equivalent,
FBDS, which incorporates a committee of stakeholders to determine
spending priorities, has worked very well and would be a sensible
model to follow for crofting grant schemes."
|