| 07/11/05           English
              cereal beef producers could double their gross margins by feeding
              head-cut wheat alkalage in place of rolled barley, according to
              the latest English Beef and Lamb Executive (EBLEX) trials.   And
              the potential gains may be even greater for heifer finishers, given
            the diet’s apparent ability to reduce carcase fat levels. The trials, conducted by Harper Adams University College with
              Belgian Blue x Holstein bulls and heifers reared from 265kg, compared
              rolled barley rations from conventionally-harvested grain with
              diets based on harvesting the top 20-25 cm of wheat crops at approximately
              70% dry matter, cracking the grains and ensiling them with a urea-based
              additive. Both bulls and heifers finished on this cracked head-cut urea-treated
              (CHCUT) wholecrop wheat took longer to reach slaughter condition
              than those on rolled barley. However, they recorded heavier liveweights
              at slaughter and heavier carcase weights. The fact that CHCUT wheat-fed
              heifers, in particular, recorded significantly lower carcase fat
              levels suggests the diet offers the opportunity to take them to
              heavier weights without becoming over-fat, so avoiding under-weight
              penalties. The daily dry matter intakes of both bulls and heifers fed CHCUT
              wholecrop wheat were higher than those on rolled barley, and the
              feed conversion efficiencies lower. Nevertheless, very much lower
              unit feed costs - £63/t DM for the wholecrop wheat ration
              vs £107t/DM for the barley mix – meant valuable economies
              in cost per kg carcase gain. Across all the animals, therefore, the gross margin for CHCUT
              wholecrop wheat feeding at £58/head was almost double that
              of the rolled barley at £30/head. Although the longer feeding
              period reduced the gross margin/head/year advantage, very much
              higher yields from the wheat meant an overall gross margin/ha more
              than double the rolled barley regime. Head Cut Alkalage Trial Results  (Harper Adams 2005) 
              
                | Average of Bulls and
                Heifers | Rolled
                Barley | CHCUT
                Wholecrop Wheat |  
                | Finishing period (days) | 181 | 230 |  
                | Liveweight gain (kg/day) | 1.29 | 1.12 |  
                | Carcase weight (kg) | 275 | 285 |  
                | Fatness score  | 3.44 | 2.83 |  
                | Feed cost (p/kg carcase gain) | 94 | 81 |  
                | Gross Margin (£/head) * | 30 | 58 |  
                | Gross Margin (£/head/year)* | 55 | 92 |  
                | Gross Margin (£/ha)* | 168 | 343 |  * Excluding headage payments or SFP  In addition to these direct benefits, EBLEX suggests the potential
              for head-cut alkalage to increase cereal dry matter yields improve
              cropping flexibility, simplify cereal storage and processing and
              reduce the risk of digestive disorders make the system well worth
              exploring for many English producers. A copy of the ‘Alkalage Project Final Report’ can
              be found on the EBLEX website www.eblex.org.uk  Market
                  Study Quantifies Farm Assured Beef Value 
  The French Are Coming! - English Beef Exports |