| 16/12/05
 NFUS has emphasised that the proposed EU budget compromise tabled
                by the UK, as it stands, would represent a massive blow to the
              Scottish countryside. The proposals could result in the £150 million in funding
                used to support environmental and rural development work across
                Scotland being slashed by anything from 20-40 per cent. The proposed budget could also lead to farmers in Scotland losing
                up to 20 per cent of their support payments via modulation, with
                no match-funding from the UK Treasury. This level of modulation
                would be sought by the UK government to try and plug the massive
                hole created in the rural development budget. Also, at least
                7 per cent would be removed from support payments to pay for
                the incorporation of Bulgaria and Romania into the Common Agricultural
                Policy. On top of this, there are existing cuts of 11% in the
                Single Farm Payment’s beef element to pay for the Beef
                Calf Scheme, a 6% scaleback on the extensification element and
                between 3-8% to pay for the national reserve. NFUS believes that cuts on this kind of scale could lead to
                a serious and hugely damaging decline in farming activity, with
                huge knock-on consequences for environmental management, the
                local food industry and food security. NFUS President John Kinnaird said: “The current budget proposal, if agreed, would represent
                a massive blow to Scotland’s countryside and rural communities.
                The UK Government signed up to the reform of the Common Agricultural
                Policy just two years ago; an agreement the Cabinet hailed as
                a massive achievement. This budget tabled by the UK would not
                only represent a massive u-turn from that position but would
                raise serious question marks over the future investment in the
                Scottish countryside. “I have absolutely no problem in having a serious debate
                about the future of the Common Agricultural Policy. But that
                means a debate about the kind of farming industry we want and
                the consequences for the environment, food industry and countryside
                of supporting changes which result in a dramatic decline in farming
                activity in this country. This is certainly not a reasoned debate.
                This is reform by the backdoor thanks to a proposed budget that
                has been cobbled together to get a deal before the UK vacates
                the Presidency chair. “If the Prime Minister thinks that farming is expendable
                he needs to consider the hundreds of thousands of jobs reliant
                on the industry. The agri-food sector is the UK’s largest
                manufacturing sector. Likewise, Mr Blair’s environmental
                credentials will look extremely shaky if we end up increasing
                our reliance on imported food produced halfway round the world
                to lower standards.” 
			   £150
			  Million Debate On Rural Funding 
  Water
  Abstraction Talks Continue 
  Intense
              Industry Lobby As Tallow Deadline Approaches |