26/02/08
Bovine TB pre-movement testing is costing livestock producers
more than £15 per animal, a figure deemed as a major cost
burden to their business, according to conclusions from an RABDF
farmer survey.
The findings highlight a bTB cost area that has so far been ignored,
and are being used by RABDF in its Government lobbying activities
for a badger cull in areas where there is a high and persistent
bTB incidence, combined with an effective programme of cattle controls.
The survey, which was completed by University of Reading for RABDF,
was designed to identify the true farm costs associated with bTB
pre-movement testing in England and Wales. Sixty livestock farmers
were involved, they pre-movement tested cattle on average 2.45
times in the previous 12 months usually prior to sale, to another
farm or through a market. There was substantial variation in the
number of animals tested, from less than five to over 100, with
an average of 28.6 animals tested per testing occasion. Most farms
had to collect cattle especially for the test.
The farm costs associated with pre-movement testing fell into four major categories shown in Table 1.
Table 1: bTB pre-movement testing costs
|
Cost (£) / animal
|
Farm labour
|
4.00
|
Vet
|
4.33
|
Extra resources and management time
|
0.51
|
Farm business disruption time/missed marketing opportunities
|
6.52
|
Total
|
15.36
|
Source: University of Reading
The majority of farmers indicated that pre-movement testing was
a cost burden to their business. While the average pre-movement
test worked out at £15.36
per animal, the distribution of testing costs per animal across
the sample of farms showed considerable variation, with a substantial
proportion of farms incurring costs of more than £20 per
animal.
“The survey highlights an area of significant costs that
had so far been completely forgotten when it comes to controlling
further spread of this debilitating disease,” comments RABDF
chairman, Lyndon Edwards. “At a time when Defra is insisting
that farmers adopt a cost and responsibility sharing approach to
animal health, this survey has confirmed they are already doing
just that. These livestock farmers are having to foot the bill
to cover measures which are part of Defra’s legislative requirement
in its current bTB control programme, and while they are prepared
to do that, the vast majority are desperate for Defra to fulfil
its half of the bargain.”
The University of Reading’s Prof Richard Bennett added: “It
is clear from the survey that disruption to the farm business is
likely to be a larger cost of bTB pre-movement testing for many
cattle farms, and one which is particularly difficult for these
farmers to quantify, which leads them to under-estimate the total
costs involved.”
Bluetongue Risk to Scotland Without Vaccine is Too High
NFUS Delivers Foot and Mouth Petition to Downing Street
Protect High Value Heifers from Leptospirosis Well Before Turnout
|