| 03/07/07           Climate change may have an impact on where livestock are located,
              and how they are housed, transported and cared for. This will have financial implications for producers, and will
              also have wider environmental consequences for society. This raises
              the question, ‘how much should be spent over the next two
              decades to offset these private and public good impacts and who
            should spend it?’ This issue is now being addressed in a two year Defra-funded project
		      led by SAC economist, Dominic Moran, with inputs from key industry stakeholders,
		      IGER (Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research) and a multidisciplinary
		      team combining expertise in grassland modeling, animal nutrition, health
		      and welfare, and economics. The team will look at the extent of the impact
		      of climate change on UK livestock and will assess how much, if anything,
		      should be spent by government to adapting the sector to potential adverse
		      impacts. After forecasting how warming scenarios will impact UK livestock production
		      practices, the team will then consider the best possible combination
		      of adaptation measures and their costs, before recommending on the range
		      of publicly funded adaptation options. These recommendations will take
		      note of current sector reforms and the need to account for background
		      changes likely to occur even without climate change.   
		      	Livestock production generates more gross revenue than any other
		        single output in UK agriculture; in 2003 the value of livestock
		        output (i.e. livestock production and products) was £9.2 billion
		        of which £5.9
		        billion was livestock production.The four major livestock groups
		        (cattle, sheep, pigs and poultry) have different geographical
		        distributions and so can be expected to be affected differently by
		        warmer summers, wetter winters, more flooding events and the emergence
	          of a range of pests	Adaptation to climate change is likely to take place slowly,
		        and at a cost borne predominantly by private producers themselves.
		        But there may be instances where private adaptation may have
		        unintended side effects on the environmental and animal health and
		        welfare; this is where public interest may be at stake.Informed adaptation by government will be a process of working
		        out how to safeguard areas of society that may be particularly
		        vulnerable to climate related impacts. Not all areas will be
		        equally exposed, and both private and public sectors should only
		        logically invest in adaptation up to the point that delivers a benefit
		        in terms of avoided damages. From a government perspective, the
		        basic economic need is to identify where and when to spend money to
		        help livestock producers to adapt in a way that minimize the public
		        good impacts.  Natural England supports Year of Food and Farming 
  Young People Wanted for A Life On The Land 
  Traditional landscapes are changing says Natural England 
  Who Will Pay For The Countryside?
 |